Anita Kusumawardhani*

Magister Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Aisyah Khairunissa

Magister Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Nandang Budiman

Magister Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Sardin

Magister Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jipsd.v12i1.53693

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kecerdasan spiritual dan motivasi kerja pendidik yang valid dan reliable diterapkan pada guru di Indonesia. Metodenya menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk menemukan hubungan antara korelasi dan regresi, dimana proses pengumpulan datanya menggunakan pola kuesioner. Proses pengukuran kecerdasan spiritual dan modifikasi diujicobakan pada 104 sampel guru di Bandung, Garut, Tangerang dan Lubuk Linggau. Hasil penelitian menggunakan alat ukur kecerdasan spiritual sebanyak 24 aitem dan modifikasi kerja pendidik sebanyak 18 aitem. Berdasarkan hasil uji regresi linier, kecerdasan spiritual ditemukan sebagai kekuatan yang memiliki pengaruh secara signifikan terhadap motivasi mengajar (p = 0.010). Namun, nilai R² yang relatif kecil (0.127) menunjukkan bahwa kecerdasan spiritual hanya menjelaskan sekitar 12.7% variasi dalam motivasi mengajar, yang berarti terdapat faktor lain yang juga mempengaruhi motivasi mengajar yang belum dimasukkan dalam model ini.

Kata kunci: Kecerdasan Spiritual; Motivasi Kerja Guru

ABSTRACT 

This study aims to analyze the influence of spiritual intelligence and work motivation of educators that are valid and reliable applied to teachers in Indonesia. The method uses a quantitative approach to find the relationship between correlation and regression, where the data collection process uses a questionnaire pattern. The process of measuring spiritual intelligence and modification was tested on 104 teacher samples in Bandung, Garut, Tangerang and Lubuk Linggau. The results of the study used a spiritual intelligence measuring instrument of 24 items and a modification of educator work of 18 items. Based on the results of the linear regression test, spiritual intelligence was found to be a force that had a significant influence on teaching motivation (p = 0.010). However, the relatively small R² value (0.127) indicates that spiritual intelligence only explains about 12.7% of the variation in teaching motivation, which means that there are other factors that also influence teaching motivation that have not been included in this model.

Keywords: Spiritual Intelligence; Teacher Work Motivation 

REFERENCES

Anwar, K., Widyanti, R., Adawiah, R., & Triyuliadi, U. (2021). The Effect of Work Motivation and Commitment on Teacher Performance. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(4), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i4.397 

Dias, T.C., Ratumanan, T.G., & Souisa, T.R. (2021). The effect of work motivation on teacher performance. Technology Reports of Kansai University (TRKU), 63(01), 6895– 6907.

Emmons, R. A. (2000). "Is Spirituality an Intelligence? Motivation, Cognition, and the Psychology of Ultimate Concern." The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 3-26.

George and Wolman. (2006). Spiritual Intelligence in Life. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Educuation.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2007). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133

Kristiawan, M., Kesumawati, N., & Hamdani (2018). the influence of teachers’ work motivation and principals’ managerial competence on teachers’ performance. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, Vol. 23(9), Ver. 1 https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2309017276 

Lukman, L., Lian, B., & Sari, A.P. (2020). The influence of principal's leadership and work motivation toward teacher's performance. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, Vol. 22 (1) , 376-379. https://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v22.1.2087

Lunenburg, F.C., & Ornstein, A.C. (2012). Educational administration concepts and practices, sixth edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning

Murtiningsih, M., Kristiawan, M., & Lian, B. (2019). The correlation between supervision of headmaster and interpersonal communication with work ethos of the teacher. European Journal of Education Studies. Vol. 6(1), 246-256. https://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2398.

Paloutzian, R. F. (Ed.). (2000). Spiritual intelligence: A special issue of the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764909

Purwanto, Ngalim, M. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya. 

_________, 2008. Rumusan visi dan misi, Dinas Pendidikan Kota Depok, http://disdik.depok.go.id, (diakses 28 Januari 2013). 

Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2008). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education.

Sardiman, A.M. 2004. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers. 

Setiyaningsih, T.T. (2020) Influence of school leadership, discipline, and work motivation toward high school teacher performance Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Vol. 7, No. 1, (66-77) https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v7i1.13423

Sudjana. N. 1999. Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya. 

Sumanto, Wasty. 1998. Psikologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Rhineka Cipta

Uno, H.B. (2007). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Vaughan, F. (2002). "What Is Spiritual Intelligence?" Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(2), 16-33.

Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2000). SQ: Connecting with Our Spiritual Intelligence. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.